Case study · Financial Services

Touchless AP for the easy invoices, faster close on the hard ones.

CrossRoads worked with the CFO to redesign the AP and close process end-to-end, combining straight-through processing for clean invoices, a focused exception workflow for the rest, and a tightened close cadence. Senior finance time shifted from chasing accruals to analyzing the result.

Illustrative placeholderFinance & Value AdvisoryWorking capitalSprint: Finance

Illustrative — a pattern drawn from comparable engagements. No specific client or unverifiable results are claimed.

Client context

The situation

A services group with multiple legal entities on a shared ERP, processing tens of thousands of invoices a month across captured PO and non-PO spend. Close was anchored to manual reconciliation work that compressed the analytical window every period.

Business challenge

What had to change

  • Long close cycle limited time for analysis and commentary
  • AP exception handling was unstructured and unowned across entities
  • Inconsistent coding eroded reporting quality and audit confidence
  • Working capital was leaking through missed early-payment terms
What CrossRoads did

The work

We ran an AP automation and close-acceleration sprint, redesigning the invoice-to-pay flow with a small finance-led squad, then sequenced controls, exception workflow, and close cadence change over the following quarter.

Workstreams delivered
01

Invoice-to-pay redesign

Re-mapped clean vs. exception paths; configured straight-through processing for PO-matched, recurring, and rules-coded invoices.

02

Exception workflow

Tiered exception queue with clear ownership, ageing thresholds, and supplier-facing communication.

03

Close cadence

Hard-close vs. soft-close redesign; standardized cut-offs and pre-close checks.

04

Controls & reporting

Continuous-controls monitoring of high-risk transactions and dashboards for AP ageing, accruals quality, and close progress.

Measurable results

What changed, measured

~70%
of invoices touchless
PO-matched and rules-coded flow.
12 → 6
days to close
After two cycles on the new cadence.
~30%
reduction in senior finance hours per close
Reallocated to analysis.
<1%
audit-flagged AP exceptions
Down from a low single-digit baseline.

Figures are illustrative ranges drawn from comparable engagements. Validated against your data during diagnostic.

Operationally

What changed in how the business runs

  • Finance leadership reviews the result, not the reconciliation
  • Supplier queries are handled in a single, owned workflow
  • Coding quality is monitored continuously, not sampled in audit
  • Early-payment economics are visible and acted on weekly
Value realization

How value was tracked

Value modeled across three pools — labor reallocation from manual processing, working-capital benefit from on-time payment and dynamic discounting, and control-cost reduction from automated monitoring. Tracked monthly in a finance value-realization log.

Lessons learned

What we'd carry into the next engagement

Lesson 1

Touchless only works when the exception path is genuinely owned

Lesson 2

Close acceleration is a cadence change as much as a tooling change

Lesson 3

Don't automate around bad master data — fix it as part of the sprint

Facing a comparable situation?

Tell us the sector and the question. We'll send the most relevant references — approved or anonymized — and a suggested next step.